CBO vs ABO: 3 Core Decision Logic for Facebook Ad Budget Allocation

Release Date:2025-03-17

Views:

Hello boss, when placing Facebook ads, you often face an important decision: should you choose CBO (campaign budget optimization) or ABO (ad group budget optimization)? The following three decision-making principles will help you accurately control the pace of placement.

The key difference: automation vs. control
CBO is a system-driven dynamic allocation, and the total budget is regulated in real time by the algorithm. When the conversion rate of a certain ad group increases suddenly, the system will tilt 70% of the budget to it within 6 hours. It is suitable for efficient expansion of verified models, but new groups may be quickly eliminated.
ABO is a manually controlled static allocation, and the budget of each advertising group is locked independently. Even if the initial data of a group is not good, the basic exposure can still be guaranteed. This is the core line of defense for testing new materials and new audiences.

Data verification: a game between efficiency and risk

CBO measured effect: After the mature advertising group switched to CBO, the average weekly consumption increased by 300%, but the survival rate of the new group was less than 20%.
ABO core value: A beauty brand used ABO to test 5 new materials, locking in a budget of $300/day for each group. It was eventually found that the average order value of users aged 30-40 was 42% higher than predicted, and the system algorithm had initially determined that this group was inefficient.

Rigid enforcement guidelines

CBO is a must-choose option in the volume expansion phase: When the CPA of the main ad group fluctuates ≤±10% for 3 consecutive days, immediately start CBO to grab volume, and the exposure efficiency can be increased by 5 times
Mandatory ABO in the testing phase: For the first 7 days of a new product/new audience, the budget of each group is ≥$200/day. A fitness brand found that the retention rate of men aged 35+ is 2.3 times that of the algorithm.
Dynamic switching strategy: Adopting the three-step method of "7-day ABO verification → CBO impulse → abnormal group switching back to ABO", the overall ROI increased by 65% in one case

Final Conclusion
CBO pursues maximum scale, while ABO ensures decision-making accuracy. Experts often build a firewall between the two: using ABO to build a solid data foundation during the testing period, using CBO to break through the growth bottleneck during the mature period, and using ABO to intercept budget out of control during the fluctuation period. The next issue will explain in detail the three data trap avoidance methods of CBO. Click to follow and master the core rules of budget allocation.

If you have any questions about the construction and operation of foreign trade websites , please contact Yiyingbao technical customer service WeChat: Ieyingbao18661939702, and the staff will answer you wholeheartedly!