On July 13, 2026, Vietnam's Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) issued Circular 12/2026/TT-BCT, adding a more specific front-end disclosure requirement for overseas B2B websites selling goods or services to Vietnamese companies: the website homepage footer must display the “Electronic Transaction Declaration Number” in Vietnamese and link to the official verification page. For Chinese manufacturing companies' independent sites, cross-border B2B service websites, and suppliers relying on Vietnamese enterprise customers for orders, this is not just a page display detail; it directly affects whether the business conditions for Vietnam's procurement side to complete compliance procurement approval can be met, and it deserves synchronized attention from foreign trade, legal, website operations, and customer-facing teams.

According to the information provided, on July 13, 2026, Vietnam's Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) issued Circular 12/2026/TT-BCT, requiring all overseas B2B websites selling goods or services to Vietnamese companies, including Chinese manufacturing companies' independent sites, to display in a fixed position in the homepage footer the “Electronic Transaction Declaration Number” (ETR-ID) issued in Vietnamese by Vietnam's national e-commerce platform.
This disclosure area not only needs to display the declaration number, but also needs to link to the MOIT filing system verification page. The confirmed information also indicates that if this disclosure is not completed, Vietnamese buyers will be unable to complete compliant procurement approval.
From the known information, this requirement applies to overseas B2B websites that sell goods or services to Vietnamese companies, with the focus not on general brand presentation, but on online information presentation that can be verified for procurement compliance.
Analysis shows that the most directly affected are cross-border B2B sellers using independent sites to receive inquiries, quotes, orders, or contract communications from Vietnamese companies. The reason is that the new rule moves something that may originally have remained at the filing or compliance level to a publicly visible position in the homepage footer. The impact is mainly reflected in website front-end revisions, compliance information display, and the trust verification process after customer visits.
What such companies should pay more attention to now is whether the website has a dedicated business scenario for selling to Vietnamese companies, and whether the homepage footer has the conditions for fixed, public, and verifiable jump links.
From the business chain perspective, the impact on Vietnamese buyers is concentrated in procurement compliance review. Confirmed facts indicate that websites that do not disclose the relevant information will cause buyers to be unable to complete compliant procurement approval. This means that when screening suppliers, conducting internal approvals, and retaining records, procurement parties may treat whether the homepage displays the Vietnamese ETR-ID and its verification link as a prerequisite check item.
For procurement teams, the change may not occur in the procurement demand itself, but more likely in supplier onboarding, approval attachment verification, and compliance communication stages.
Observation shows that teams providing website building, compliance support, operations outsourcing, or customer handover services for cross-border B2B companies will also be affected. The reason is that this requirement is not an abstract policy statement, but an execution action that directly corresponds to homepage footer display, language presentation, and verification link settings.
What such service roles need to pay attention to is not only whether the relevant information is online, but also the website language version, homepage structure, and update timeliness, so as to avoid delays in order progression caused by missing front-end display.
From a practical perspective, the first thing to confirm is whether the company website falls within the scope of “overseas B2B websites selling goods or services to Vietnamese companies.” For manufacturers, traders, or service providers that already use independent sites to serve Vietnamese customers, this judgment should be completed as early as possible, because it determines whether the homepage disclosure content needs to be adjusted next.
What is more worth paying attention to right now is that the provided information emphasizes the Vietnamese disclosure in the fixed position of the homepage footer, as well as the requirement to jump to the MOIT filing system verification page. Analysis suggests that when interpreting the rule, companies cannot stop at “whether there is a declaration number”; they must also consider “whether it is displayed in the specified way and whether it is convenient for buyers to verify.” The key difference between policy signals and business implementation lies in public presentation and verifiability.
For suppliers that already cooperate with Vietnamese enterprise customers, the practical focus may fall on customer communication. Since non-disclosure will affect the buyer's completion of compliant procurement approval, companies should pay attention to whether the website disclosure status needs to be stated in quotes, business communications, or supplier material packages, so as to reduce order delays caused by customer internal approval obstacles.
Observation shows that the currently known information has clarified the disclosure location, language requirement, type of declaration number, and direction of the verification link, but the execution path, inspection method, or the applicable boundaries of more detailed rules have not been further provided. Therefore, relevant companies should continue to monitor whether the official statement adds clarifications, so that the implementation method can be adjusted in time.
From an industry perspective, the clear signal released by this article is that when cross-border B2B websites conduct transactions with enterprise customers in specific countries, compliance requirements are being embedded more directly into the website front-end and procurement verification process. The point here is not simply to add a page element, but to turn “whether it can be quickly verified by the buyer” into one of the pre-transaction conditions.
Analysis shows that this change is more appropriately understood as a rule change that already has practical business binding force rather than just a conceptual reminder; however, the extent of its subsequent enforcement, industry differences, and broader derivative impact still need to be continuously observed, and no definitive conclusion beyond the known information should be drawn from this alone.
Returning to the industry level, the significance of this new rule lies in the fact that it directly binds Vietnam's enterprise procurement compliance with the homepage disclosure of overseas B2B websites. For relevant enterprises, the earliest impact is reflected in website presentation, customer approval coordination, and internal compliance collaboration, rather than merely a technical footer adjustment.
Rationally speaking, it is more appropriate to understand this article as a rule change that already carries practical business constraints. Whether it will be further extended to more detailed execution requirements still depends on subsequent information verification, but for website operators already serving Vietnamese enterprise customers, quickly checking applicability and disclosure status has already become a real issue.
This article was generated based on the title, event time, and event summary provided by the user. The known core information includes: July 13, 2026, Vietnam's Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT), Circular 12/2026/TT-BCT, Vietnamese disclosure of ETR-ID in the homepage footer of overseas B2B websites, linking to the MOIT filing system verification page, and the fact that non-disclosure will affect Vietnamese buyers' ability to complete compliant procurement approval.
During ongoing verification, such information is usually cross-checked with official announcements, documents issued by the competent department, company announcements, industry association information, authoritative media reports, and relevant system documents. Since no specific official source link is provided in the input, the details of the relevant article and the subsequent execution path still need ongoing verification. Directions worth further attention include: whether the official side issues supplementary explanations, whether the applicable boundaries are further clarified, and how enterprises respond to this disclosure requirement in actual procurement approval.
Related Articles
Related Products


